 |
Expensing of Stock Options
Updated: October 1, 2003
Issue:
Proposals are being considered by both the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)
to mandate the expensing of employee stock
options.
Technology entrepreneurs use stock options to attract and retain their
employees. A survey conducted by the Council of its membership indicated
that approximately eighty percent of the responding companies grant
stock options to more than eighty per cent of their employees.
Governmental Activity:
In response to FASB's and IASB's proposals to mandate the expensing of employee stock
options, legislation has been filed in both Houses of Congress that
would:
- Direct the Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate
new rules requiring enhanced disclosures of the effects of stock
options on a shareholder’s interest in a company. Such new
disclosures would require plain English descriptions of the dilutive
effect of option grants, prominent display of pertinent information
regarding stock option plans and a summary of the options granted
to the 5 most senior executives.
- Require that the SEC, after three years from the issuance of
the new disclosure rules, conduct a study of the effectiveness
of the enhanced disclosures in increasing transparency to current
and potential investors and to deliver the results of the study
to the appropriate congressional committees within 180 days and
prohibit the SEC from enforcing any new options accounting rules
for 60-days after the study is transmitted.
- Require that the Commerce Department, within one year after
enactment of the legislation, submit a report to Congress on the
effects stock options have on matters such as recruitment and
retention of skilled workers, stimulating research and innovation,
economic growth of the United States and strengthening the international
competitiveness of US companies
Software Council Position:
The Council favors full and frequent disclosure to investors of the
dilutive effects of stock options on earnings per share.
The Council opposes regulations or legislation that would force companies to expense
the granting of stock options. The expensing of stock options would severely damage
the ability of technology entrepreneurs to build and retain their
workforce through granting stock options to their employees and
would likely end the use of stock options except for the most senior
executives.
The real cost of employee stock options lies in the potential dilution
of each investor’s share of company ownership. Requiring that
employee stock options be counted as a compensation expense would
result in double counting in the earnings per share calculation,
which would provide misleading information to investors.
Even assuming that employee stock options are an expense, there
are presently no pricing models that adequately value them. The
only model for valuing stock options that does not mislead investors
is the “intrinsic value” method set forth in APB Opinion
No. 25, where the difference between the fair market value at the
time of the grant and the grant price is expensed.
Most important, the Council believes that the intrinsic value method
of valuation is particularly appropriate for broad-based employee
stock ownership plans. The Council urges FASB to redirect its efforts
to reform Statement No.123 toward stimulating a discussion of the
intrinsic value method as it relates to the promotion of broad-based
plans.
Software Council Activity:
The Council has been an active member of the International Employee
Stock Options Coalition, which consists of a wide range of trade associations
and companies, including high-tech, manufacturing and service companies,
in the U.S. and abroad that support broad-based employee stock option
plans.
The Council has worked closely with the Massachusetts Congressional
Delegation to urge their support of broad-based employee stock option
plans and their opposition to legislation that would mandate expensing
of stock options.
The Council established a Task Force on stock options, which focused
its attention on methods of valuing options and filed comments with
FASB endorsing the intrinsic value method of valuation.
For further information see: http://www.savestockoptions.org.
|
|
|
|
 |